🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is archived on Snapchat, and now they demand us to fork out money for it."

One-star ratings and a feeling of injustice have flooded online discussion since Snapchat emerged as the most recent digital platform to put a price tag on a function that individuals previously accessed for free.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in September that it would begin imposing fees people if they have more than five GB of archived pictures and videos stored as Snapchat Memories.

For many, these retro posts function as a portal to bygone days – driving some to criticize the company of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on social media and unfavorable ratings on digital storefronts.

Other Choices

The company has compared its premium storage tiers to those made available by tech giants for handsets.

As another possibility for those who don't want to pay, subscribers may save their archived media – which for many people amount to significant data – to their device.

The firm indicated that only a limited group of subscribers would be affected by the new policy.

The company admitted that it was "always challenging to transition from using a feature without cost to subscribing to it" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for users.

Numerous criticising the decision on the internet seem to disagree.

Public Outcry

An online petition labeled the charge a "archival levy", with users calling it "bleak" and "absurd" – while one person threatened to abandon the platform again.

Meanwhile, in a negative review on the app marketplace, a person calling themselves a pseudonymous user said it felt "deeply unfair".

"Based on my understanding of millennials, most of us have extensive archives of personal moments on this service," they commented. "Numerous users only remained on the platform mainly for that feature. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have extensive collections of moments... Bye Snap."

And, a journalism student, a 20-year-old media studies major in London, shared on TikTok her plans to remove the application.

"I decided that I had to save all my memories as soon as I could," she explained. "The vast majority of my youth have been recorded through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are really important to me."

"It just doesn't make sense to introduce fees people for a feature that has been free for such a long time."

Unknown Fees

The platform has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would be priced at in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

However a London resident Amber Daley, who also lives in the capital, stated in a video on TikTok that she would be "devastated" by these fees.

She mentioned that the service had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in several years ago.

Although she acknowledged she understood the platform needed to earn income, she suggested that the Memories feature holds greater significance than the firm may have realized.

"In my opinion it's a somewhat inequitable decision to impose fees on your customers who have been consistent and engaged," she explained. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Professional Insight

Companies choosing to require payment from users for a service that was previously free is a common practice, and numerous people subscribe to services like digital backup services to backup their images and clips from their handset.

The fact of archiving content in the online servers – which various commentators in the digital field often describe as simply "a remote system" – is that it involves expenses.

"Storing enormous quantities of Memories on Snapchat demands considerable investment," social media consultant Matt Navarra stated. "Snapchat has to try to find a method to fund the operation of archiving, data transfer, back-ups, media distribution, data protection – the entire process."

However the consultant said that requiring payment for a function that had previously been free, and subscribers had been prompted to utilize as such, may feel like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Altering the terms after individuals have created this massive online collection feels inappropriate," he explained. For numerous users, he continued, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're personal mementos."

The sentiment was echoed by those submitting negative feedback, with one person labeling their archived media "the most precious thing to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my experiences within them from celebrations of new family members' births, mourning of passed loved ones, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Academic Insight

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, stated that the company's action demonstrates the ramifications of commercial platforms being used to save meaningful individual recordings.

"The companies profit from this reliance, connected relationship, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even motivates many people to remain with the platform or persist with the feature in order to revisit their stored media," she explained to journalists. "Yet these are not benevolent guardians of private remembrance."